(Press-News.org) WASHINGTON — Clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews of the evidence base for health care services are supposed to offer health care providers, patients, and organizations authoritative guidance on the comparable pros and cons of various care options, but too often they are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines, leading to variability in the handling of conflicts of interest, appraisals of evidence, and the rigor of the evaluations. Two new reports from the Institute of Medicine recommend standards to enhance the quality and reliability of these important tools for informing health care decisions (see illustration).
Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust recommends eight standards to ensure the objective, transparent development of trustworthy guidelines. Several problems hinder providers' and others' ability to determine which among thousands of sometimes competing guidelines offer reliable clinical recommendations. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews recommends 21 standards to ensure objective, transparent, and scientifically valid reviews. Poor quality reviews can lead clinicians to the wrong conclusions and ultimately to inappropriate treatment decisions.
"These standards are necessary given that there is little documentation to judge the quality and reliability of many of the existing clinical practice guidelines," said Sheldon Greenfield, Donald Bren Professor of Medicine and executive director, Health Policy Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, and chair of the committee on guidelines. "Practice guidelines provide valuable data and guidance that not only inform individual decisions about care but ultimately could also improve overall health care quality and outcomes."
"This report presents the 'gold standard' to which those who conduct systematic reviews should aspire to achieve the most reliable and useful products," said Alfred O. Berg, professor of family medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, and chair of the committee that wrote the report on systematic reviews. "We recognize that it will take an investment of resources and time to achieve such high standards, but they should be adopted to minimize the chances that important health decisions are based on information that may be biased or erroneous."
To prevent actual or perceived conflicts of interest from eroding trust in clinical practice guidelines, members of guideline development groups should not have intellectual, institutional, financial, or other forms of conflicts whenever possible, says the guidelines report. However, if a group cannot perform its work without conflicted individuals, they should make up only a minority of the members. Those who fund guideline development work should have no role in the development process. Similarly, individuals with clear financial conflicts of interest as well as those with professional or intellectual biases that would lessen an evaluation's credibility should be excluded from the teams that conduct systematic reviews, the report on reviews says.
Getting input from consumers, health professionals, insurers, and other intended users can boost the quality of reviews and guidelines and make them more relevant. Guideline development groups should include a current or former patient and a patient advocate or representative of a consumer organization. Systematic reviews should include a method to collect information from individuals with relevant perspectives and expertise. Individuals providing input should publicly acknowledge their potential biases and conflicts and be excluded from the process if their participation would diminish the evaluation's credibility.
People expect clinical practice guidelines to provide an accurate, fair account of the potential benefits and harms of various health care options and they expect systematic reviews to provide a complete picture of all that is known about an intervention. Because guideline developers often have to make subjective judgments about evidence, especially when it is low-quality or limited, they should explicitly describe the part that value judgments, theory, or clinical experience played in their recommendations, the guidelines report says. They should explain the reasoning underlying each recommendation they make, including their assessment of the quality, completeness, and consistency of the available evidence. Teams conducting systematic reviews should not limit their evaluations to the published literature or large databases because negative findings sometimes go unpublished and these tools provide only a partial picture of the evidence, the report on reviews says. Reviewers should seek out relevant unpublished information. And they should clearly describe the team's methodology, selection criteria, and assessment of the evidence, including what remains unknown about the topic.
###
The studies were requested by Congress and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. For more information, visit http://national-academies.org or http://iom.edu. Committee rosters follow.
Contacts:
Christine Stencel, Senior Media Relations Officer
Luwam Yeibio, Media Relations Assistant
Office of News and Public Information
202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu
Additional resources:
Report Brief for Practice Guidelines
Report Brief for Systematic Reviews
Illustration
Practice Guidelines Website
Systematic Reviews Website
Pre-publication copies of Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at http://www.nap.edu. Additional information is available at http://www.iom.edu. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
Board on Health Care Services
Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines
Sheldon Greenfield, M.D. (chair)
Donald Bren Professor of Medicine
and Executive Director
Health Policy Research Institute
University of California
Irvine
Earl P. Steinberg, M.D., M.A. (vice chair)
Senior Vice President of Clinical Strategy, Quality, and Outcomes
WellPoint Inc., and
President and CEO
Resolution Health Inc.
Columbia, Md.
Andrew Auerbach, M.D.,
M.P.H.
Associate Professor of Medicine in
Residence
School of Medicine
University of California
San Francisco
Jerry Avorn, M.D.
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School, and
Chief
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology
and Pharmaconomics
Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston
Robert S. Galvin, M.D.
CEO
Equity Healthcare, and
Executive Director
Corporate Private Equity
The Blackstone Group
New York City
Raymond J. Gibbons, M.D.
Consultant in Cardiovascular Disease and Internal Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minn.
Joseph Lau, M.D.
Director
Evidence-Based Practice Center
Tufts Medical Center
Boston
Monica Morrow, M.D.
Chief of Breast Service and Anne Burnett Windfohr Chair of Clinical Oncology
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and
Professor of Surgery
Weill Medical College
Cornell University
New York City
Cynthia Mulrow, M.D.
Senior Deputy Editor
Annals of Internal Medicine
American College of Physicians
San Antonio
Arnold J. Rosoff, J.D.
Professor of Legal Studies and Health Care Management
The Wharton School;
Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health
School of Medicine; and
Senior Fellow
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
John Santa, M.D., M.P.H.
Director
Consumer Reports Health Ratings
Center
Yonkers, N.Y.
Richard N. Shiffman, M.D., M.C.I.S.
Professor of Pediatrics
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Conn.
Wally R. Smith, M.D.
Professor and Chair
Division of Quality Health Care, and
Scientific Director
Center on Health Disparities
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond
Walter F. Stewart, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Associate Chief Research Officer
Center for Health Research
Geisinger Health System
Danville, Pa.
Ellen L. Stovall, B.A.
Senior Health Policy Adviser
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
Silver Spring, Md.
Brian L. Strom, M.D., M.P.H.
Chair and Professor
Department of Biostatistics and
Epidemiology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Marita G. Titler, Ph.D., R.N.
Associate Dean
Office of Practice and Clinical
Scholarship
School of Nursing
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor
STAFF
Robin Graham, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Study Director
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
Board on Health Care Services
Committee on Standards for Systematic Review of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Alfred O. Berg, M.D., M.P.H. (chair)
Professor
Department of Family Medicine
University of Washington School of Medicine
Seattle
Sally C. Mortom, Ph.D. (vice chair)
Professor and Chair
Department of Biostatistics
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh
Jesse Berlin, Ph.D.
Vice President of Epidemiology
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and
Development
Titusville, N.J.
Giselle Corbie-Smith, M.D., M.Sc.
Professor
Departments of Social Medicine and Medicine
School of Medicine
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill
Kay Dickersin, M.A., Ph.D.
Professor of Epidemiology, and
Director
Center for Clinical Trials and U.S. Cochrane Center
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore
Jeremy Grimshaw, M.B.Ch.B., Ph.D.
Senior Scientist
Clinical Epidemiology Program
Ottawa Hospital Research Center, and
Director
Center for Best Practice
Institute of Population Health
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario
Mark Helfand, M.D., M.S., M.P.H.
Professor of Medicine and Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, and
Director
Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland
Vincent E. Kerr, M.D.
President
Care Solutions
United HealthCare
Fairfield, Conn.
Marguerite Koster, M.A., M.F.T
Practice Leader
Technology Assessment and Guidelines Unit
Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Pasadena, Calif.
Katie Maslow, M.S.W.
Scholar in Residence
Institute of Medicine
Washington, D.C.
David A. Mrazek, M.D., F.R.C.Psych
Chair
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minn.
Christopher Schmid, Ph.D.
Director
Biostatistics Research Center
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, and
Professor of Medicine
Tufts Medical Center
Tufts University
Boston
Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Ph.D.
Professor of Epidemiology and Nutrition, and
Associate Chair of Epidemiology
Gillings School of Global Public Health
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill
Harold C. Sox, M.D.
Editor Emeritus
Annals of Internal Medicine
American College of Physicians of Internal Medicine
Hanover, N.H.
Paul J. Wallace, M.D.
Medical Director
Health and Productivity Management Programs
The Permanente Federation
Oakland, Calif.
STAFF
Jill Eden
Study Director
IOM recommends standards to achieve reliable clinical practice guidelines
2011-03-24
ELSE PRESS RELEASES FROM THIS DATE:
Risk-based approaches to security at DOE nuclear weapons facilities -- new report
2011-03-24
The U.S. Department of Energy's costs for securing its facilities that house nuclear weapons and material have increased from $550 million in 2002 to around $930 million in 2010. UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING RISK IN SECURITY SYSTEMS FOR THE DOE NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX, a congressionally requested report from the National Research Council, examines whether risk-based approaches, including probabilistic risk assessment, could be used to improve methods for determining security requirements at these facilities.
###Advance copies of the report will be available to reporters ...
Research brings habitat models into the future
2011-03-24
EAST LANSING, Mich. -- Time marches on, and thanks to Michigan State University research, models of wildlife habitat now can monitor changes over time more accurately and more easily.
"Monitoring and projecting future changes are essential for sustainable management of coupled human and natural systems, including wildlife habitat," said Jianguo "Jack" Liu, Rachel Carson Chair in Sustainability at MSU. "Innovative computer models are urgently needed for effective monitoring and projection."
Mao-Ning Tuanmu, doctoral student in MSU's Center for Systems Integration and ...
Prostate cancer spreads to bones by overtaking the home of blood stem cells
2011-03-24
ANN ARBOR, Mich.---Like bad neighbors who decide to go wreck another community, prostate and breast cancer usually recur in the bone, according to a new University of Michigan study.
Now, U-M researchers believe they know why. Prostate cancer cells specifically target and eventually overrun the bone marrow niche, a specialized area for hematopoietic stem cells, which make red and white blood cells, said Russell Taichman, professor at the U-M School of Dentistry and senior author of the study.
Once in the niche, the cancer cells stay dormant and when they become active ...
Molecular muscle: Small parts of a big protein play key roles in building tissues
2011-03-24
BETHESDA, Md., March 24, 2011 – We all know the adage: A little bit of a good thing can go a long way. Now researchers in London are reporting that might also be true for a large protein associated with wound healing.
The team at the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology at Imperial College reports in the Journal of Biological Chemistry that a protein generated when the body is under stress, such as in cases of physical trauma or disease, can affect how the protective housing that surrounds each cell develops. What's more, they say, tiny pieces of that protein may one day ...
Does belief in free will lead to action?
2011-03-24
Free will may be an illusion. Yet we persist in believing we are the masters of our fates—and that belief affects how we act. Think you determine the course of your life and you're likely to work harder toward your goals and feel better about yourself too. Think you don't, and you're likelier to behave in ways that fulfill that prophesy.
"Folk psychology tells us if you feel in control, you perform better," says Davide Rigoni, an experimental psychologist now at the University of Marseille. "What is crucial is that these effects are present at a very basic motor level, ...
Earning its stripes
2011-03-24
WORCESTER, Mass. – Looking at the dark stripes on the tiny zebrafish you might not expect that they hold a potentially important clue for discovering a treatment for the deadly skin disease melanoma. Yet melanocytes, the same cells that are are responsible for the pigmentation of zebrafish stripes and for human skin color, are also where melanoma originates. Craig Ceol, PhD, assistant professor of molecular medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, and collaborators at several institutions, used zebrafish to identify a new gene responsible for promoting ...
New way to detect epileptic seizures
2011-03-24
This press release is available in French. Montreal, March 23, 2011 – Researchers at Concordia University have pioneered a computer-based method to detect epileptic seizures as they occur – a new technique that may open a window on the brain's electrical activity. Their paper, "A Novel Morphology-Based Classifier for Automatic Detection of Epileptic Seizures," presented at the annual meeting of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, documents the very successful application of this new seizure-detection method.
An epileptic seizure, which is caused by disruptions ...
UCSB scientists get glimpse of how the 'code' of life may have emerged
2011-03-24
(Santa Barbara, Calif.) –– A portion of the "code" of life has been unraveled by a UC Santa Barbara graduate student from the town of Jojutla, Mexico.
Annia Rodriguez worked with John Perona, professor in UCSB's Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, to decipher intramolecular communication within a large RNA-protein enzyme responsible for expressing the genetic code for the amino acid glutamine.
To their surprise, the experiments by Rodriguez captured a partial glimpse of how the genetic coding of life may have emerged. The results of the study are published in ...
Staten Island Dentist Creates Smiles All Over The World
2011-03-24
For his generous heart and giving spirit, Dr. Frederick S. Hecht, of Staten Island Dental Care was the recipient of the 2011 Humanitarian Dentist of the Year Award at the Crown Council 16th Annual Event in Phoenix, Arizona on February 5th.
The Frances Hammond Humanitarian Award recognizes an individual, who, in the spirit of Frances Hammond, has shown a commitment to the humanitarian ideals she so lovingly gave in a lifetime of service to others.
Dr. Ron Arndt says: "Dr. Hecht is this rather robust, outspoken, often imposing and loud man's outside persona. But just ...
UC research produces novel sensor with improved detection selectivity
2011-03-24
A highly sensitive sensor that combines a variety of testing means (electrochemistry, spectroscopy and selective partitioning) into one device has been developed at the University of Cincinnati. It's already been tested in a variety of settings – including testing for components in nuclear waste.
The sensor is unusual in that most sensors only have one or two modes of selectivity, while this sensor has three. In practical terms, that means the UC sensor has three different ways to find and identify a compound of interest. That's important because settings like a nuclear ...