Study reveals exposure to wildlife and forest walks helps ease symptoms of PTSD in US war veterans

(Press-News.org) A new study published in the journal Human-Animal Interactions has revealed that exposure to wildlife and forest walks can help ease the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in US war veterans.

Researchers from UMass Chan Medical School studied 19 veterans with PTSD or PTSD symptoms and found that walking in the forest, assisting with wildlife care in a rehabilitation centre, seeing wildlife in a sanctuary, and bird watching improved psychological symptoms, especially reducing anxiety.

Those that took part in the near four-month study in Massachusetts were also given bird feeders to help provide a sustainable connection to wildlife once the research – which included observing animals at the Maine Wildlife Park and walking through Harvard Forest – was over. All the settings included education such as learning about bird identification at the Mass Audubon Broad Meadow Brook Conservation Center and Wildlife Sanctuary.

Veterans benefited more from their immersion in wildlife settings

Finding of the study suggest that the veterans benefited more from their immersion in wildlife settings – including coming up close with a Sulcata tortoise at the New England Wildlife Center – than a forest walk.

Dr Donna Perry, UMass Chan Medical School, said, “While many studies involving interactions between humans and other species aimed at improving psychological or physical health have involved domestic animals, few have focused on wildlife.

“We found that the response of veterans with PTSD to wildlife immersion suggests improved psychological symptoms as well as connection to nature/wildlife and increased understanding and concern for animal welfare and conservation-related issues.

“Nature-based interventions are dynamic and require a flexible design, which may be addressed through immersion experiences.”

Especially meaningful when animals chose to engage with humans

Dr Perry said the participants in the study reflected that interactions with wildlife were especially meaningful when animals chose to engage with humans.

One participant said, “Because animals are just- There's no control . . . They have their own free will. Got their own way of thinking and doing things, so if they like you . . . there's a feeling of feeling connected with nature.”

Another individual described a similar spontaneous encounter in her post study journal. “I sat on the patio and I saw a red squirrel running by. He stopped and looked at me, I thought he was so cute. I really felt connected to him.”

In some cases, participants seemed to identify with animals, such as an individual who was assisting to feed a baby grey squirrel through a syringe. In this case, a technician held the squirrel for the participant as it was reported to be “a biter.”  As she fed the squirrel the participant said, “He’s the black sheep. He’s probably related to me. He’s beautiful.”

Mutual benefits for humans and wildlife

Dr Perry said, “The findings also suggest that improvements in depression and wellbeing may be mediated through transcendent feelings in response to the human-wildlife interactions.

“The study supports that placing veterans in an environment where they can connect with animals that have also undergone loss, and suffering may foster healing in the veterans themselves.

“Being exposed to and assisting with care of injured wildlife also raises awareness of the effects of humans on the environment and may enhance conservation attitudes. This suggests that settings providing wildlife care and public education may be mutually beneficial for both human and beyond-human animals.”

The scientists say that future research with larger numbers of participants would be helpful to more deeply explore mutual benefits for humans and animals within specific realms of interaction, such as physical contact through animal care or reminiscing through the extended realm.

They add that additional studies would be also helpful to explore animal-assisted therapies in which formal therapeutic interventions are included with the wildlife immersion.

 

Full paper reference

Perry, Donna J.; Crawford, Sybil L.; Averka, Jesse J.; Mackin, Jill M.; Granger, Douglas A.; Smelson, David A, ‘Wildlife and Wellbeing: Wildlife Immersion Experiences in Veterans with PTSD,’ Human-Animal Interactions, 6 March (2025). DOI: 10.1079/hai.2025.0006

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/hai.2025.0006

Media enquiries

For more information and an advance copy of the paper contact:

Dr Donna Perry, UMass Chan Medical School; Tan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing – email: DonnaJ.Perry@umassmed.edu

Wayne Coles, Senior PR Manager, CABI – email: w.coles@cabi.org

About Human—Animal Interactions

Human—Animal Interactions is an open access interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of research in all fields related to interactions between non-human animals and their human counterparts.

About CABI

CABI is an international not-for-profit organization that improves people’s lives by providing information and applying scientific expertise to solve problems in agriculture and the environment.

Through knowledge sharing and science, CABI helps address issues of global concern such as improving global food security and safeguarding the environment. We do this by helping farmers grow more and lose less of what they produce, combating threats to agriculture and the environment from pests and diseases, protecting biodiversity from invasive species, and improving access to agricultural and environmental scientific knowledge. Our 49-member countries guide and influence our core areas of work, which include development and research projects, scientific publishing, and microbial services.

We gratefully acknowledge the core financial support from our member countries (and lead agencies) including the United Kingdom (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office), China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Netherlands (Directorate-General for International Cooperation, and Switzerland (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation). Other sources of funding include programme/project funding from development agencies, the fees paid by our member countries and profits from our publishing activities which enable CABI to support rural development and scientific research around the world.

END