(Press-News.org) Just over half (51%) of published novelists in the UK believe that artificial intelligence is likely to end up entirely replacing their work as fiction writers, a new University of Cambridge report shows.
Close to two-thirds (59%) of novelists say they know their work has been used to train AI large language models (LLMs) without permission or payment.
Over a third (39%) of novelists say their income has already taken a hit from generative AI, for example due to loss of other work that facilitates novel writing. Most (85%) novelists expect their future income to be driven down by AI.
In new research for Cambridge University’s Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy (MCTD), Dr Clementine Collett surveyed 258 published novelists earlier this year, as well as 74 industry insiders – from commissioning editors to literary agents – to gauge how AI is viewed and used in the world of British fiction. *
Genre authors are considered the most vulnerable to displacement by AI, according to the report, with two-thirds (66%) of all those surveyed listing romance authors as “extremely threatened”, followed closely by writers of thrillers (61%) and crime (60%).
Despite this, overall sentiment in UK fiction is not anti-AI, with 80% of respondents agreeing that AI offers benefits to parts of society. In fact, a third of novelists (33%) use AI in their writing process, mainly for “non-creative” tasks such as information searches.
However, the report outlines profound concerns from the cornerstone of a publishing industry that contributes an annual £11bn to the UK economy, and exports more books than any other country in the world.
Literary creatives feel that copyright laws have not been respected or enforced since the emergence of generative AI. They call for informed consent and fair remuneration for the use of their work, along with transparency from big tech companies, and support in getting it from the UK government.
Many warn of a potential loss of originality in fiction, as well as a fraying of trust between writers and readers if AI use is not disclosed. Some novelists worry that suspicions of AI use could damage their reputation.
“There is widespread concern from novelists that generative AI trained on vast amounts of fiction will undermine the value of writing and compete with human novelists,” said Dr Clementine Collett, BRAID UK Research Fellow at Cambridge’s MCTD and author of the report, published in partnership with the Institute for the Future of Work.
“Many novelists felt uncertain there will be an appetite for complex, long-form writing in years to come.”
“Novels contribute more than we can imagine to our society, culture, and to the lives of individuals. Novels are a core part of the creative industries, and the basis for countless films, television shows, and videogames,” said Collett.
“The novel is a precious and vital form of creativity that is worth fighting for.”
Tech companies have the fiction market firmly in their sights. Generative AI tools such as Sudowrite and Novelcrafter can be used to brainstorm and edit novels, while Qyx AI Book Creator or Squibler can be used to draft full-length books. Platforms such as Spines use AI to assist with publishing processes from cover designs to distribution.
“The brutal irony is that the generative AI tools affecting novelists are likely trained on millions of pirated novels scraped from shadow libraries without the consent or remuneration of authors,” said Collett.
Along with surveying a total of 332 literary creatives, who participated on condition of anonymity, Collett conducted focus groups and interviews around the country, and convened a forum in Cambridge with novelists and publishers. **
Many novelists reported lost income due to AI. Some feel the market is increasingly flooded with AI-generated books, with which they are forced to compete. Others say they have found books under their name on Amazon which they haven’t written.
Some novelists also spoke of online reviews with telltale signs of AI, such as jumbled names and characters, that give their books bad ratings and jeopardise future sales.
“Most authors do not earn enough from novels alone and rely on income streams such as freelance copywriting or translation which are rapidly drying up due to generative AI,” said Collett. ***
Some literary creatives envisioned a dystopic two-tier market emerging, where the human-written novel becomes a “luxury item” while mass-produced AI-generated fiction is cheap or free.
When it came to working practices, some in the study consider AI valuable in speeding up repetitive or routine tasks, but it was seen to have little to no role to play in creativity.
Almost all (97%) novelists were “extremely negative” about AI writing whole novels, or even short sections (87% extremely negative). The aspects novelists felt least negative about using AI for were sourcing general facts or information (30% extremely negative), with around 20% of novelists saying they use AI for this purpose.
Around 8% of novelists said they use AI for editing text written without AI. However, many find editing to be a deeply creative process, and would never want AI involved. Almost half (43%) of novelists felt “extremely negative” about using AI for editing text.
Forum participant Kevin Duffy, founder of Bluemoose Books, the publisher behind novels such as The Gallows Pole and Leonard and Hungry Paul – both now major BBC TV dramas – is on record in the report saying:
“[W]e are an AI free publisher, and we will have a stamp on the cover. And then up to the public to decide whether they want to buy that book or not. But let’s tell the public what AI is doing.” Many respondents echoed this sentiment. ****
The research found widespread backlash against a “rights reservation” copyright model as proposed by the UK government last year, which would let AI firms mine text unless authors explicitly opted out.
Some 83% of all respondents say this would be negative for the publishing industry, and 93% of novelists said they would ‘probably’ or ‘definitely’ opt out of their work being used to train AI models if an opt out model was implemented.
The vast majority (86%) of all literary creatives preferred an ‘opt in’ principle: rights-holders grant permission before AI scrapes any work and are paid accordingly. The most popular option was for AI licensing to be handled collectively by an industry body – a writers’ union or society – with half of novelists (48%) selecting this approach.
“Our creative industries are not expendable collateral damage in the race to develop AI. They are national treasures worth defending. This report shows us how,” said Prof Gina Neff, Executive Director of the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy.
Some novelists worry AI will disrupt the “magic” of the creative process. Stephen May, writer of acclaimed historical novels such as Sell Us the Rope expressed anxiety over AI taking the required “friction” and “pain” out of a first draft, diminishing the final product.
“Novelists, publishers, and agents alike said the core purpose of the novel is to explore and convey human complexity,” said Collett. “Many spoke about increased use of AI putting this at risk, as AI cannot understand what it means to be human.”
Authors fear AI may weaken the deep human connection between writers and readers at a time when reading is already at historically low levels, particularly among the next generation: only a third of UK children say they enjoy reading in their free time.
Many novelists want to see more AI-free creative writing on the school curriculum, and government-backed initiatives aimed at finding new voices from underrepresented groups to counter risks of “homogeneity” in fiction brought about by generative AI.
The research reveals a sector-wide belief that AI could lead to ever blander, more formulaic fiction that exacerbates stereotypes, as the models regurgitate from centuries of previous text. Some suggest the AI era may see a boom in “experimental” fiction as writers work to prove they are human, and push the artistry further than AI.
“Novelists are clearly calling for policy and regulation that forces AI companies to be transparent about training data, as this would help with the enforcement of copyright law,” added Collett.
“Copyright law must continue to be reviewed and might need reform to further protect creatives. It is only fair that writers are asked permission and paid for use of their work.”
Notes:
* Of the published novelists involved in the survey, 90% are published “traditionally” through publishing houses, while 10% are self-published.
** This consisted of 32 literary agents for fiction (9%), 258 published novelists (78%), and 42 professionals who work in fiction publishing (13%). The survey took place between February and May 2025.
*** The median income for an author in the UK in 2022 was just £7,000, far lower than the minimum wage. [Thomas, A., Battisti, M., & Kretschmer, M. (2022). UK Authors’ Earnings and Contracts 2022.]
**** Full quote from Kevin Duffy as featured in the report: “'For a small independent publisher of literary fiction like Bluemoose Books, our only stand is to say we don’t want any part of this, we are AI free, and we are an AI free publisher, and we will have a stamp on the cover. And then up to the public to decide whether they want to buy that book or not. But let’s tell the public what AI is doing. It’s got brilliant capacity to do fantastic things in other avenues, but for the creative industries and for literary fiction in particular, it is very limited.”
The full report, The Impact of Generative AI on the Novel, will be published on the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy website: https://www.mctd.ac.uk/
The research in the report was supported by the BRAID (Bridging Responsible AI Divides) programme with funds received from the Arts and Humanities Research Council [grant number AH/X007146/1]. This report is published in association with the Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and with the Institute for the Future of Work.
END
Half of novelists believe AI is likely to replace their work entirely, research finds
2025-11-20
ELSE PRESS RELEASES FROM THIS DATE:
World's largest metabolomic study completed, paving way for predictive medicine
2025-11-20
UK Biobank has today [Thursday 20 November] released the final set of data on nearly 250 metabolites – the molecules in our blood produced by our bodies as we go about our lives – in half a million volunteers. This completes the world’s largest ever metabolomic study, which will help researchers to better predict who is at highest risk of disease and drive treatment strategies for neurological conditions, ...
Center for Open Science awarded grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to preserve and safeguard publicly funded scientific data
2025-11-19
Media Contact: pr@cos.io
The Center for Open Science (COS) has been awarded a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to develop a community-driven strategic plan for ensuring the long-term preservation, accessibility, and usability of federally-funded scientific data.
COS has long championed policies and practices that increase the openness, integrity, and trustworthiness of research. The success of the open science movement relies on the integrity, sustainability, and resilience of infrastructures that promote access to research outputs, like scientific data. In 2025, the sudden removal of public data from multiple federal agency ...
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia researchers identify genetic factors influencing bone density in pediatric patients
2025-11-19
Philadelphia, November 19, 2025 – Researchers at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) revealed important genetic components that affect bone density in children and adolescents. This information could help identify pediatric patients who may benefit from strategies to help improve their bone health at an early age, helping them maintain healthy bones and prevent fractures in adulthood.
Many children experience fractures due to accidents and recover quickly, but there are many reasons why children may have weak bones or be at risk for developing fragile bones. Chronic health conditions, dietary restrictions and steroid use all impact bone mineral metabolism. ...
Trapping particles to explain lightning
2025-11-19
Using lasers as tweezers to understand cloud electrification might sound like science fiction but at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA) it is a reality. By trapping and charging micron-sized particles with lasers, researchers can now observe their charging and discharging dynamics over time. This method, published in Physical Review Letters, could provide key insights into what sparks lightning.
Aerosols are liquid or solid particles that float in the air. They are all around us. Some are large and visible, such ...
Teens who play video games with gambling-like elements more likely to start real betting, study suggests
2025-11-19
Young people who play video games with “gambling-like” elements – such as buying loot boxes or in-game items – are more likely to go on to gamble with real money.
That’s the suggestion of a new longitudinal study of gambling behaviour and attitudes in young people.
A team of experts from Belgian institutions KU Leuven and the University of Ghent quizzed more than 2,000 young gamers twice, with a year gap in-between. In follow-up surveys, it was shown those who engage in games with gambling-like elements were more likely to then gamble with real money than those who did not.
The research team, who publish their findings ...
Maternal health program cuts infection deaths by 32%
2025-11-19
A landmark multi-country clinical trial has shown that a structured, sustainable approach to infection prevention and treatment can save women’s lives, cutting severe maternal infections and deaths by about one-third (32%) compared to usual care. The maternal programme of prevention and treatment (APT-Sepsis) was developed by researchers at the University of Liverpool, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN’s Special Programme in Human Reproduction (HRP).
Maternal infection and sepsis remain ...
Use of head CT scans in ERs more than doubles over 15 years
2025-11-19
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 4 P.M. ET, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2025
MINNEAPOLIS — A new study shows large increases in the use of computed tomography (CT) scans of the head in emergency departments across the United States from 2007 to 2022. The study, which was published on November 19, 2025, in Neurology®, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology, also found disparities in use of head CTs by race, type of insurance and hospital location.
“Head CT scans are a critical tool for diagnosing neurological emergencies, but their growing use raises concerns about cost, ...
Open spaces in cities may be hotspots for coyote-human interaction
2025-11-19
COLUMBUS, Ohio – Open semi-natural settings in urban areas – like parks and golf courses teeming with plants and small mammals – are possible hotspots for interaction between coyotes and humans, a new study suggests.
Researchers analyzed times and locations in Chicago when coyotes were on the move at the same time people were working, socializing or otherwise occupied outside the home.
The analysis showed that overlap of human and coyote activity would be far more probable in areas with a high proportion of open space and less likely to ...
Focused ultrasound passes first test in treatment of pediatric brain cancer
2025-11-19
NEW YORK, NY--Columbia University researchers are the first to show that focused ultrasound — a non-invasive technique that uses sound waves to enhance the delivery of drugs into the brain — can be safely used in children being treated for brain cancer.
The focused ultrasound technique, developed by Columbia engineers, was tested in combination with chemotherapy in three children with diffuse midline glioma, a rare and ...
Beef vs. plant-based meat: UT Austin study finds diet alters breast milk composition in under a week
2025-11-19
AUSTIN, Texas — Swapping beef for a plant-based meat substitute changed breast milk composition in just six days — even when the rest of the diet was made up of whole, unprocessed foods — according to a first-of-its-kind study from researchers at The University of Texas at Austin.
The findings, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, reveal that even small shifts in a breastfeeding family’s diet can quickly alter the types of fats their infant receives through breast milk. These changes could have implications for brain development and immune function. The study tested the effect of food processing by using meals that were nutritionally ...