Overall, women who are invited to attend mammography screening have a 23 per cent risk reduction in breast cancer death (owing to some attending and some not), compared with women not invited by routine screening programmes.
In the UK, this relative risk translates to around eight deaths prevented per 1,000 women regularly attending screening, and five deaths prevented per 1,000 women invited to screening.
Stephen Duffy, Professor of Cancer Screening at Queen Mary University of London, and experts from 16 countries assessed the positive and negative impact of different breast cancer screening methods, based on a comprehensive analysis of evidence from 11 randomised controlled trials and 40 high-quality observational studies.
The latest findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, were coordinated by the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC), the World Health Organisation's specialised cancer agency, and will contribute to an update of the IARC Handbook on breast cancer screening, last published in 2002.
The findings look at breast cancer screening on a global level and therefore take into account routine screening programmes (where all women of a certain age are invited to attend) and opportunistic screening services (which operate in countries without a set programme).
Commenting on the findings, Professor Stephen Duffy of Queen Mary University of London, said: "This important analysis will hopefully reassure women around the world that breast screening with mammography saves lives. The evidence proves breast screening is a vital tool in increasing early diagnosis of breast cancer and therefore reducing the number of deaths.
"In the UK we are extremely fortunate to have the NHS Breast Screening Programme where all women aged 50-70 years are invited to attend. Women invited to this service can be reassured the programme is endorsed by internationally respected organisations and experts."
The report confirms previous findings that women aged 50-69 years benefit most from breast cancer screening. However, several studies also showed a substantial reduction in risk of death from breast cancer by inviting women aged 70-74 years for screening - a shift away from previous consensus. Only limited evidence was identified in favour of screening women in their 40s.
Professor Duffy continues: "Despite evidence that mammography screening is effective, we still need to carry out further research on alternative screening methods, such as the promising 'digital breast tomosynthesis'; a newly developed form of 3D imaging which could potentially improve the accuracy of mammography in coping with more dense breast tissue.
"It is also vital we continue researching the most effective ways of screening women at high risk of breast cancer due to family history or genetic status. We need further evidence to fine-tune services offered to high risk women in terms of different screening methods, from an earlier age and possibly at shorter intervals."
The purpose of breast screening is to diagnose women with breast cancer earlier - therefore improving prognosis and reducing the number of late-stage cases and deaths. However, concerns have been raised over the negative impact of mammography screening - notably, false-positive results, overdiagnosis, and possibly radiation-induced cancer. This new review builds upon previous evidence which suggests the potential benefits of breast screening outweigh the risks.
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in women in developed countries and the leading cause of cancer death in low and middle-income countries, where a high proportion of women are diagnosed in advances stages of the disease.
In the several decades since breast cancer screening was identified as an effective method in reducing breast cancer deaths, mammography screening has been implemented in high-income countries, and less so in countries in central and Eastern Europe - in either opportunistic or organised programmes. Most countries in Latin America have national recommendations or guidelines and in other low and middle income countries, breast cancer screening is promoted primarily by advocacy groups and periodic campaigns to promote breast awareness.
INFORMATION:
For more information contact:
Charli Scouller
PR Manager (School of Medicine and Dentistry)
Queen Mary University of London
c.scouller@qmul.ac.uk
Tel: 020 7882 7943 / 07709825741
Notes to the editor
The statistics in this paper reflect the relative risk reduction in dying from breast cancer based on whether a woman aged 50-69 years attends breast cancer screening (40 per cent risk reduction) or is invited to attend breast cancer screening (23 percent risk reduction). Because women invited for screening don't always attend, the 23 per cent is a mixture of the 40 per cent benefit in those who actually attend screening and the zero benefit in those who do not attend.
Organised screening programmes are characterised by invitations to a target population at given intervals, systematic recalls for assessment of detected abnormalities, delivery of test results, investigations, treatment and follow-up care, with regular monitoring and evaluation of the programme, and a national or regional team responsible for service delivery and quality. Opportunistic programmes typically provide screening to women on request, and coincidentally with routine health care.
About Queen Mary University of London
Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) is one of the UK's leading universities, and one of the largest institutions in the University of London, with 20,260 students from more than 150 countries.
A member of the Russell Group, we work across the humanities and social sciences, medicine and dentistry, and science and engineering, with inspirational teaching directly informed by our research - in the most recent national assessment of the quality of research, we were placed ninth in the UK (REF 2014).
We also offer something no other university can: a stunning self-contained residential campus in London's East End. As well as our home at Mile End, we have campuses at Whitechapel, Charterhouse Square and West Smithfield dedicated to the study of medicine, and a base for legal studies at Lincoln's Inn Fields.
We have a rich history in London with roots in Europe's first public hospital, St Barts; England's first medical school, The London; one of the first colleges to provide higher education to women, Westfield College; and the Victorian philanthropic project, the People's Palace based at Mile End.
QMUL has an annual turnover of £350m, a research income worth £100m, and generates employment and output worth £700m to the UK economy each year.
