Read the source, then the headline

Our new research briefs link to the underlying publication and identify the study design, population and outcomes. We state whether a brief is based on an abstract or a full paper. Selected topic dossiers are not comprehensive systematic reviews.

Our collective byline

Press-news Team is the publication’s collective author name. It does not identify a medical reviewer or imply that a human checked an article. Each article’s preparation note states how it was made and what review has taken place.

What AI does

AI researches sources, prepares drafts and checks claims against the material it can access. Educational evidence guides may be published after an AI source check; their transparency note explicitly says when no human review has occurred. An AI check is not independent verification. Clinical research analyses remain drafts until their source check and a real, identified clinical review are completed.

We do not treat a model's confidence score as a measure of scientific certainty. Missing data stays missing, and generated wording must not invent a patient, quotation, study or result.

What the labels mean

Research brief
A focused reading of a named publication, with its limitations and source links.
Explainer
An educational guide to reading evidence. Worked examples are labelled as illustrative.
Draft · review pending
A private preview item awaiting editorial checks, excluded from public research feeds and sitemaps.

Dates and corrections

A brief's publication date is separate from the date of the study it discusses. Older research is not presented as a newly released study. Substantive updates are recorded in the editorial history. Corrections can be requested through our contact page.

Our historical archive

The original press release archive remains available at its existing addresses. It contains institutional announcements and earlier material prepared under previous publishing processes. The new review workflow applies to the research section; it is not a claim that every archive item has been re-reviewed.

Independence and personal decisions

Funding and conflicts reported by a study should be considered when interpreting it. Sponsored material, if introduced, must be labelled. The site explains research and does not provide an individual diagnosis or treatment plan.

Images & credits

Our photographs, micrographs and medical images provide editorial context. Captions identify the specimen or object; an illustration does not show a study’s participants, data or results unless explicitly stated. An image does not imply endorsement by its creator or institution.

Images are sourced from Unsplash and Wikimedia Commons. Each item has its own source and rights statement below. Commons is a repository; the named creators retain the applicable credit. Images are resized, converted to WebP and may be cropped by the page layout. Derivatives retain the source licence. Our explanatory diagrams are original reading aids and are labelled separately from measured results.

Your library

Bookmarks and followed topics use local browser storage. They are not sent to an account and do not sync between devices. Clearing browser data removes them. RSS feeds are available without a subscription form.