In a case study of the care of two patients with confirmed or suspected EVD at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center's Special Clinical Studies Unit, a multidisciplinary team detailed the challenges and surprises encountered in preparing and caring for patients with EVD. Although procedures for similar care had been long established, the reality of the patients' cases required flexibility and ability adjust procedures quickly.
"Years of planning and drills for care of a patient exposed or infected with Ebola could not anticipate the external scrutiny in which care was delivered," said Tara Palmore, MD, a lead author of the NIH case study and hospital epidemiologist in the NIH Clinical Center. "Many precautions were taken to prevent the spread of the virus, and some were taken to mitigate fear, even if science did not always support those fears. We were humbled by the commitment of healthcare providers and others to the mission of caring for these patients."
While the experiences of NIH staff illustrate the intensive and special efforts required for this care, a study detailing a survey of more than 250 SHEA members -- including hospital epidemiologists and infection preventionists in 41 states and the District of Columbia, including all of the U.S. centers that have cared for EVD -- demonstrates the extensive preparation underwent throughout the country. Survey respondents suggest that preparedness exercises, including institutional plan development, staff training in triage and personal protective equipment (PPE) use, and managing changing national and international guidelines, took up more than 80 percent of infection control staff time, leaving time for only 30 percent of routine infection prevention activities to be completed during this period.
Key themes include: Interest from Media and General Public: A surge in interest from both the media and general public made it more difficult to preserve patient confidentiality at NIH. Staff did not anticipate the high volume of calls to the unit from other medical centers and the public. Attitudes toward Ebola: NIH noted that the anxiety fueled by the admission of these patients was reminiscent of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s. Transparency and Patient Impact: Transparency with the public and patients was crucial. Communication with staff and patients, both inpatient and outpatient, were distributed to reassure everyone of the detailed infection control precautions in place. Despite these efforts of reassurance, more than 40 patients canceled or rescheduled appointments. In the survey of SHEA members, while only two patients were diagnosed with unrecognized EVD, more than 140 were evaluated. This created trickledown problems including delays in patient care and patient anxiety. Staffing: The team at NIH was able to coordinate an all-volunteer frontline staff that included infectious disease specialists, nurses, intensivists, lab and radiology technologists, and respiratory therapists. Trained observers were onsite around-the-clock to monitor each staff member through the process of putting on and removing PPE, helping guarantee staff safety. Training: NIH conducted training with a large cadre of staff, prioritizing staff that would provide direct care or handle patient specimens. Training was time and labor intensive. Nationally, 64 percent of survey respondents noted that care teams would be selected primarily from volunteers. While 65 percent of respondents reported hosting drills or exercises to help staff prepare, only 30 percent of frontline providers has been trained in appropriate PPE use and less than half of hospitals could provide laboratory testing of patients with suspected EVD. Waste Disposal: NIH worked with trained contractors to undertake this endeavor. Working with state and local sanitation officials, clinical leadership developed a plan to adequately address concerns around waste disposal.
"Hospital Ebola preparations required extraordinary resources, which were diverted from routine infection prevention activities," said Daniel J. Morgan, MD, MS, an author of the SHEA survey and associate profession of epidemiology and public health at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. "Patients being evaluated for Ebola faced delays and potential limitations in the management of other diseases that are more common in travelers returning from West Africa."
INFORMATION:
Tara Palmore, Kevin Barrett, Angela Michelin, Amanda Ramsburg, Laura Lee, Richard Davey, David Henderson. "Challenges in Managing Patients who have Suspected or Confirmed Ebola Virus at the National Institutes of Health." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. Web. (April 1, 2015).
Daniel Morgan, Barbara Braun, Aaron Milstone, Deverick Anderson, Ebbing Lautenbach, Nasia Safdar, Marci Drees, Jennifer Meddings, Darren Linkin, Lindsay Croft, Lisa Pineles, Daniel Diekema, Anthony Harris. "Lessons Learned From Hospital Ebola Preparation." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. Web. (April 1, 2015).
About ICHE
Published through a partnership between the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Cambridge University Press, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. ICHE is ranked 13 out of 158 journals in its discipline in the latest Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports from Thomson Reuters.
SHEA is a professional society representing physicians and other healthcare professionals around the world with expertise and passion in healthcare epidemiology, infection prevention, and antimicrobial stewardship. SHEA's mission is to prevent and control healthcare-associated infections, improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare settings, and advance the field of healthcare epidemiology. SHEA improves patient care and healthcare worker safety in all healthcare settings through the critical contributions of healthcare epidemiology and improved antibiotic use. The society leads this specialty by promoting science and research, advocating for effective policies, providing high-quality education and training, and developing appropriate guidelines and guidance in practice. Visit SHEA online at http://www.shea-online.org, http://www.facebook.com/SHEApreventingHAIs and @SHEA_Epi.
About Cambridge Journals
Cambridge University Press publishes over 350 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide spread of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are leading academic publications in their fields and together form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today.
For further information about Cambridge Journals, visit journals.cambridge.org.
About Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University's mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
Its extensive peer-reviewed publishing lists comprise 45,000 titles covering academic research, professional development, over 350 research journals, school-level education, English language teaching and bible publishing.
Playing a leading role in today's international market place, Cambridge University Press has more than 50 offices around the globe, and it distributes its products to nearly every country in the world.
For further information about Cambridge University Press, visit cambridge.org.
