Groundbreaking quantum study puts wave-particle duality to work

(Press-News.org) Since its development 100 years ago, quantum mechanics has revolutionized our understanding of nature, revealing a bizarre world in which an object can act like both waves and particles, and behave differently depending on whether it is being watched. 

In recent decades, researchers exploring this wave-particle duality have learned to measure the relative “wave-ness” and “particle-ness” of quantum objects, helping to explain how and when they veer between wave-like or particle-like behaviors. Now, in a paper for Physical Review Research, researchers at Stevens Institute of Technology report an important new breakthrough: a simple but powerful formula that describes the precise closed mathematical relationship between a quantum object’s “wave-ness” and “particle-ness.”

“Wave-particle duality is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics,” says Xiaofeng Qian, the paper’s lead author and an Assistant Professor of Physics at Stevens. “Researchers have been working to quantify wave-particle duality for half a century, but this is the first complete framework to fully quantify wave-like and particle-like behaviors with optimum quantitative measures that are relevant at the quantum level.” 

Previous research showed that wave-ness and particle-ness could be expressed as an inequality, with the sum of an object’s wave-like behaviors (such as visible interference patterns) and particle-like behaviors (such as the predictability of its path or location) being equal to or less than one. “That’s important, because it means that if an object is fully wave-like, then it shows no particle-like behaviors, and vice versa,” Qian explains.

Such models were incomplete, however, because they can describe situations in which an object’s wave-like and particle-like behaviors increase simultaneously—the opposite of the actual exclusive relationship between the two behaviors. To remedy that, the authors introduced a new variable: the coherence of the quantum object. 

“Coherence is a tricky concept, but it’s essentially a hidden description of the potential for wave-like interference,” Qian explains. “And the conventional measure visibility represents the amount of wave-ness can be extracted. When we quantify and compensate for coherence, alongside the standard metrics for wave-ness and particle-ness, we find they add up to exactly one.” 

That enables the calculation of both wave-ness and particle-ness with far more precision. By measuring the coherence in a system, in fact, it becomes possible to calculate a quantum object’s level of wave-ness and particle-ness—not simply as “less than one,” but as an exact value. 

The relationship between wave-ness and particle-ness can then be plotted as an elegant curve on a graph—a perfect quarter-circle for a perfectly coherent system, and a flatter ellipse as the level of coherence declines.

Besides expanding our understanding of foundational physics, the team’s breakthrough has significant potential applications in fields such as quantum information and quantum computing. 

To demonstrate that, Qian’s team applied their theory to a technique called quantum imaging with undetected photons (QIUP), in which an object aperture is scanned with one of a pair of entangled photons. If the photon passes through unimpeded, coherence remains high; if it collides with the walls of the aperture, coherence falls sharply. 

By then measuring the wave-ness and particle-ness of the entangled partner-photon, Qian’s team could deduce its coherence—and thus map the shape of the aperture. “This shows that the wave-ness and particle-ness of a quantum object can be used as a resource in quantum imaging, and potentially many other quantum information or computational tasks,” Qian says. 

Remarkably, imaging remained possible even as external factors, such as temperature or vibrations, degraded the overall coherence in the quantum system. Such factors equally affect both high coherence situations (where the photon passes through the aperture) and low coherence situations (where the photon impacts the scanned object), so it remains possible to detect the difference in coherence between the two scenarios. “The ellipse gets squeezed, but we’re still able to extract the information of the object we need,” Qian explains. 

Further research is needed, most notably to determine how wave-particle duality plays out in more complex multipath quantum scenarios. “The mathematics make it look simple, but we’re a long way from exhausting the weirdness of quantum mechanics,” Qian says. “There are still plenty of frontiers left for us to explore.”
 

END