Hair Salons Are Climate Influence Spaces. Research Now Shows Why That Matters.
Climate change communication has a persistent problem: the people who need to change their behavior are rarely in the rooms where experts talk about why they should. Public lectures, media campaigns, and government messaging reach some audiences some of the time. But most people spend most of their lives in ordinary spaces - offices, kitchens, and, at regular intervals, hair salons.
A study from researchers at the University of Bath's Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations (CAST), in collaboration with the Universities of Cardiff, Oxford, and Southampton, examines what happens when the sustainability conversation moves into the salon chair. The findings, published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, suggest that hairdressers occupy a position of social influence that has been largely overlooked by climate communicators.
Trust Built Over Years
The research started from a straightforward sociological observation: hairdressers often maintain long-term, repeat relationships with clients that extend over years or decades. In that kind of relationship, the dynamic is fundamentally different from a stranger receiving advice from a public health poster. Clients who see the same hairdresser for ten years may regard them as a trusted advisor, a confidante, or something approaching a counselor.
"Hairdressers build trust over months and years. That kind of relationship is gold when it comes to discussing climate change. We found salons to be unique spaces where clients feel safe, relaxed, and open to new ideas," said Dr. Sam Hampton from CAST.
The research team conducted in-depth interviews with 30 salon owners and directors about their existing conversations with clients on environmental topics. The results were clear: nearly all participating salons were already having some of these conversations, often beginning with haircare-specific topics and expanding outward to water use, plastic packaging, food choices, energy consumption, and transportation.
The Mirror Talkers Intervention
To test whether the conversational environment could be deliberately structured to improve sustainability outcomes, the team designed an intervention called Mirror Talkers - eco-tips placed on salon mirrors to prompt specific discussions during appointments. The intervention ran in 25 sustainable salons across the UK.
Approximately 73% of salon clients said they were likely to change their haircare routines following conversations prompted by the Mirror Talkers. Some reported switching to eco-friendly products; others indicated they would reduce washing frequency or lower their water temperature - small individual changes that, multiplied across millions of salon visits, represent meaningful aggregate impact on energy and water use.
Professor Denise Baden of the University of Southampton offered a specific example of how salon-scale change connects to environmental outcomes: "Most of us think a 'green' product is one with recyclable packaging, but the carbon footprint of shampoo is mostly in the hot water used, so simple messages such as 'most of us use too much shampoo and shampoo too often' can prompt conversations about how shampooing less and at lower temperatures saves time, money, energy, water and is better for your skin and hair condition."
Limitations and Broader Applicability
The study's scope warrants some caution about generalization. The 25 salons involved were already identified as "sustainable," meaning they had opted into a framework of eco-conscious operation before the study began. Clients of salons that have self-selected into sustainability practices may be more receptive to environmental messages than a representative sample of salon-goers would be. Whether the same conversational influence operates in conventional salons that have not already adopted a sustainability identity is an open question the study does not resolve.
The 30 in-depth interviews with salon directors, while providing rich qualitative data on the nature of these conversations, represent a small and self-selected sample. Large-scale behavioral outcome measurement - tracking whether stated intention to change behavior translates into actual sustained change - would strengthen the evidence base considerably.
That said, the researchers' framing of hairdressers as "everyday influencers" - public-facing professionals embedded in communities with high-trust relationships and frequent repeat contact - points toward a broader principle. Barbershops, beauty salons, and similar spaces have been used as trusted venues for public health messaging in HIV prevention, hypertension screening, and mental health outreach. The same logic applies to climate communication. The challenge is developing the training, materials, and institutional support to make these conversations consistent and effective at scale.