Medicine Technology 🌱 Environment Space Energy Physics Engineering Social Science Earth Science Science
Engineering 2011-07-07

New Stop and Frisk Forms Receive Support from New York Civil Rights Violation Lawyer

The New York City Police Department is requiring NYPD officers who stop and frisk people on the street to provide an explanation for their actions.

NEW YORK, NY, July 07, 2011

The New York Police Department is changing stop and frisk forms to include a new field called "Reason for Force Used." This addition will require NYPD officers who stop and frisk people to give an explanation for their actions. New York civil rights violation lawyer David Perecman supports this move.

"There is a need for more accountability, oversight and reform in the NYPD's use of stop-and-frisk, and every improvement helps," said Perecman, a New York civil rights violation lawyer for over 30 years.

According to the New York Daily News, the field allows police officers to check off a box of six options: suspect reaching for suspected weapon, suspect flight, defense of self, defense of other and overcome resistance. An "other" box gives police room to provide a more detailed reason.

Police made the change after reviewing the results of a study performed by the Rand Corp. The study was designed to evaluate how officers stop, question and frisk people.

Apparently, officers needed to better explain stops. While the study said "whites and minorities have a roughly equal chance of being stopped by police," New York civil rights violation lawyers have seen statistics that say otherwise.

In 2009 in New York City, 576,394 people were stopped, 87 percent were African-Americans and Latino -- although they comprise only about 53 percent of New York City's total population. African-Americans were the subjects of 55 percent of the stops and Latinos made up 32 percent of stops.

Racial profiling is a violation of civil rights in New York.

"Stop and frisk searches may reduce crime, but officers must have a valid reason for suspicion before they conduct a stop or search of someone's property or person in New York," civil rights violation lawyer Perecman said. "Racial discrimination, ethnic discrimination or discrimination of any kind creates a divided city."

New York State law allows a police officer to stop, question and frisk a person he or she reasonably suspects has committed, is committing or is about to commit a crime.

"This means that no one should be treated differently or put under suspicion because of his or her race or ethnic origin. Civil rights violations are taken seriously in New York," civil rights violation lawyer Perecman explained.

Stop and frisk practices are among the most controversial police procedures. The use of this practice has led to many accusations of civil rights violations, including racial profiling and privacy rights.

About David Perecman and The Perecman Firm, PLLC:

For the past 30 years, the New York false arrest, excessive force by police, police negligence, and civil rights violation lawyers at The Perecman Firm, PLLC have handled all types of cases including civil rights violations. David Perecman, founder of the Firm, is a Board Director and the past Secretary and Treasurer of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association (NYSTLA) and a chair of its Labor Law Committee. Mr. Perecman's achievements have brought him recognition as an Honoree in the National Law Journal's Hall of Fame, in New York Magazine's "The Best Lawyers in America" and The New York Times Magazine "New York Super Lawyers, Metro Edition" for the years 2007-2010.

The Firm has recovered millions of dollars for its clients. Among the more recent victories, Mr. Perecman won a $15 million verdict* for a construction accident, a $5.35 million dollar verdict** for an automobile accident, and a $40 million dollar structured settlement for medical malpractice****.

*later settled while on appeal for $7.940 million
** later settled for $3.5 million
*** later settled for $90,000.00
**** total potential payout

"Lawyer Advertising"
"Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome."